Bisphosphates and cancer – a risk to assess.

Dr. Weeks’ Comment:  The bisphosphate medications do make bones more dense  – but the problem is that they also make the bones more BRITTLE!  (Think “chalk” – dense but brittle~)  Yet  they are prescribed like candy… and now the evidence is that these medications contribute to cancer  

Now a new article warning about the role these drugs play in esophageal cancer!…

“…The esophageal cancer risk with bisphosphonate bone drugs may be a bigger problem than thought, particularly with use of alendronate (Fosamax), an adverse event surveillance study suggested…”

 

 

ASCO: Bone Meds, Esophageal Cancers Linked

 

By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage TodayPublished: May 30, 2012Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

 

 

 

CHICAGO — The esophageal cancer risk with bisphosphonate bone drugs may be a bigger problem than thought, particularly with use of alendronate (Fosamax), an adverse event surveillance study suggested.

Overall, 128 cases of bisphosphonate-associated esophageal cancer were reported to the FDA’s adverse event reporting system (AERS) from 1995 through 2010, Beatrice J. Edwards, MD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, and colleagues found.

That risk appeared disproportionate with alendronate, the group reported in an abstract ahead of the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting that starts here later this week. That particular bisphosphonate accounted for 75% of the esophageal cancers seen with bisphosphonates in the FDA database — 6.4 times more than with any other drug in the class (P=0.001).

Alendronate likewise had an empiric Bayes geometric mean of 6.3, suggesting that the esophageal cancer cases were more common with bisphosphonates than with other drugs in the database.

“Our analysis of FDA AERS identifies a larger number of cases of esophageal cancer than previously described, and a significant safety signal with alendronate use,” they noted. “Increased awareness and vigilance is needed for patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy.”

A 2009 FDA analysis had pointed to 23 such cases with alendronate since initial marketing in 1995.

At that time no other oral bisphosphonate had any reports of a link to esophageal cancer in the adverse event reporting database, though a handful of cases with risedronate (Actonel), ibandronate (Boniva), and etidronate (Didronel) had been reported in Europe and Japan.

A subsequent British registry study suggested elevated risk with prolonged use of oral bisphosphonates, but an FDA advisory panel cited a lack of solid evidence.

Edwards’ group updated the analysis of adverse event reports received by the FDA by searching the AERS database for terms related to esophageal cancer in combination with all drug names for bisphosphonates over the period from 1996 to 2010.

The esophageal cancer events they found associated with bisphosphonate use were 96 cases with alendronate, 14 with risedronate, 10 with ibandronate, seven with zoledronic acid, and one with pamidronate (Aredia).

Barrett’s esophagus was listed in three of the cases, which led the researchers to recommend avoiding oral bisphosphonates for patients with this risk factor for esophageal cancer and also for those with persistent mucosal abnormalities.

“Esophagitis has been associated with oral bisphosphonates,” Edwards’ group noted. “Erosive esophagitis and persistent mucosal abnormalities have been noted with crystalline material (similar to ground alendronate).”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *