MEBO Preface – superior burn care

Dr. Weeks’ Comment: These words written in 2004 remain as vital a caveat today as they were a decade ago.

 

Preface to  

“Burns, Regenerative Medicine and Therapy”

By Prof. Rong Xiang Xu, M.D.

Co-Editor  Xia Sun, Ph.D.

Co-Editor  Bradford S. Weeks, M.D.

 

PREFACE

This book, which you now hold in your hands, will change how medicine is practiced around the world. It is an extraordinary book written by an extraordinary medi­cal doctor who is also a pioneering scientist in the best sense of the word. Prof. Rong Xiang Xu has a very rare spirit, for he is a man with a compassionate heart who observed the terrible suffering of his burns patients and rather than simply accepting conventional treatments (which do little to correct the burns trauma), this doctor created, with much diligence and hard work, the new stan­dard of care for burns treatment.

I first learned of Dr. Xu’s work through reading the burn literature and learning of his research efforts in Chi­na. After analyzing his published research in the late 1980s, I determined to meet and question this man whose research was so daring and innovative. In 1991, I brought a group of American doctors and scientists to China to study Dr. Xu’s MEBT/MEBO protocols. What I saw in Dr. Xu’s burn clinics astounded me.

I trained at major American teaching hospitals such as Harvard’s Massachusetts General Hospital,  University of Vermont Medical Center and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, each of which offered what we believed to be the best burns treatments in the world. We were con­fident in the 1980’s that no one took better care of burn patients than we did. Our burn patients were treated in technologically endowed surgical suites, given potent dou­ble antibiotic intravenous protocols along with topical silver-impregnated cold cream, all this administered un­der utterly sterile conditions in isolation suites and, of course, costing enormous sums of money. Our goals were, in retrospect, quite humble: keep the patients alive, reduce their pain, control their infection, and perform any surgery necessary to maximize their cosmetic and func­tional recovery. Typically, the majority of our patients left our burn units horribly scarred, yet appreciative of our efforts.

Today, I know that the burn treatment protocols offered in the best American hospitals are obsolete and, despite our best intentions, scientifically irresponsible. We must not be satisfied with clinical results which leave our patients so disabled and in such pain. That is a provo­cative statement and I offer it with the earnest hope that you, dear reader, will determine for yourself whether it is a valid statement. The book you hold in your hand with its many references describes a new way of treating burn patients and, while you may question its scientific rationale, you must, at the end of the day, behold its superior clinical results. Dr. Xu offers intriguing opinions about regenerative medicine and therapy which may or may not be validated in the future. He raises, once again, the ancient dichotomy between Vitalism and Materialism which we, in our infatuation with quantitative scientific methodology, have turned away from as we split atoms into leptons, quarks and neutrinos. Today, as we wade into genetic analysis, we are not inclined to step back and see the vital context within which the genetic process oper­ates. We see the trees but not the forest. But again, as clini­cians who have taken the oath to serve our patients, I sug­gest that, once you have done your due diligence and investigated Dr. Xu’s clinical results, then you will no lon­ger be able to practice conventional dry burn therapy again. Therefore, like all revolutionary books, this one is somewhat disconcerting. My sympathies are with you! I myself once sat where you not sit!

It is my honor to add a few preface words to this potent book, and I see my challenge as helping introduce the reader to these innova­tive ideas in a manner most conducive to enhancing collegial and collaborative discussion. Therefore, I want to address our human need for certainty and our aversion to new ideas in general. Without intending to evoke defensiveness in the reader, I am reminded of a story of a wom­an who traveled far and wide to find the right doctor for her problem. Finally, she selected a very famous and tal­ented doctor and during their first consultation, she exclaimed. ‘Oh doctor. I am so pleased that you will care for me. I do hope that you can treat what is wrong with me!’ whereupon the doctor responded: ‘My dear lady, it is my hope that you have what I treat!’ We doctors tend to be better practitioners than students of science and we are all guilty, at times, of being slow to learn new approaches to familiar problems. Innovation is not an easy path for a doctor to follow as lives are at stake and somehow we are encouraged to ‘let someone else do the research.’ In the old days, the doctor always observed his patient and con­sidered various factors that impacted the progress of the treatment. The doctor was always an innovator and al­ways felt responsible for doing his part in pushing back the frontiers of knowledge. Today, however, things have changed for most doctors and very few of us continue scientific work after beginning to practice. That does not have to be so, but to innovate as a doctor is not without peril.

There is a saying in America that you can determine which is the pioneer in a crowd of men by looking at their backs, for the pioneer is the one with the most arrows in his back. All people, scientists and doctors included, are uncomfortable with change and the innovator is often unfairly criticized as he tends to ‘rock the boat’. It is part of human nature to be wary of change, especially if some­one tries to improve what we ourselves are offering to our patients. In medicine, where unscientific practices can kill people, we all should be cautious before embracing new ideas. I know from experience that most of the medical practitioners are well-intended and we do our heart-felt best to advance science for the benefit of our trusting and long-suffering patients. So why do we resist change? Why are innovations met with distrust and resistance? Consid­er what a professor might feel were he to learn that what he taught other doctors and what he published as recom­mended treatment protocols  were now no longer the optimum protocol. That would feel very uncomfortable. That might be, depending upon the character of the professor, almost unbearable, for to the degree we offer out-dated treatments, to that same degree we are exacerbating rather than ameliorate the suffering of our patients.

Therefore, despite ourselves, doctors are slow to study innoative ideas, choosing instead to focus our effort on im­proving only that which we currently practice, not learning something new and different. The scientists among us know that economics and politics interfere too often in the scien­tific world and so I urge you, dear reader, to put aside pre­judices and comfortable paradigms and to remember the last time you listened to a dressing being changed for a burn patient. Listen in your mind’s memory to the screams of pain as the dried scabs are pulled away from living tissue beneath in order to cleanse the burns wound. Remember the look of anguish on the faces of both patient and nurse as the blood flows anew before a new layer of Silvadene® is applied. In my clinical experience, no nursing task is more heart-breaking than the dressing change of a burns patient. Now, remember if you will, the last time you shook hands with a ‘successfully treated’ burns patient upon discharge from the hospital as she returned home, scarred almost beyond recognition and still suffering from restricted movement due surgical procedures and consequent deep-tissue scarring. You know you did your best as her doctor, but what a horrible outcome. She remains scarred for life.

Now, comes the ‘what if‘? What if, dear reader, a burn treatment protocol exists that takes away severe pain, that requires no horrendous dressing changes, that features a self-cleaning circulation within the wound that removes dead cells and bacterial debris and delivers regenerative nutrients to the living tissue at the base of the burns wound? What if this burn treatment protocol works in accordance with the natural laws of tissue regeneration so that minimal antibiotic use is required and so that burn wounds heal faster and with practically no scarring, com­pared to the burn treatments offered today in the finest hospitals around the world?  ‘What if’  indeed!

As you read ahead, please remember two things:

First, please remember that Dr. Xu is offering his scientific experience to anyone interested in learning about his innovative burns treatment protocol. He has founded research institutions, sponsored international symposia, published scientific journals and been recog­nized by his government as the inventor of one of the most significant technologies in China today. Dr. Xu is seeking colleagues to continue this research and writes this book now as an invitation for other dedicated scien­tist to investigate this new paradigm. Dr. Xu has done his research and has published his findings on burns regener­ative therapy. Now it is our turn. As his medical col­leagues worldwide, it is up to us now to accept the respon­sibility to determine for ourselves whether there is merit in his claims. He now welcomes medical colleagues from around the world to come and learn what he has to teach. The world can no longer ignore his gift. These medical claims, though they sound fantastic to western ears, are indeed supported by rigorous and controlled scientific studies – both in vitro and in vivo.

Secondly, remember if you will, that I myself took time off from my practice and went to China on my own expense to determine whether Dr. Xu really was able to treat burns patients with MEBO/MEBT so that his pa­tients were in minimal pain and upon discharge, walked away happy to look in a mirror – not scarred in any signif­icant way. What I saw in Dr. Xu’s bums hospital beds and through his microscopes at his research centers has in­spired me to treat my burns patients with MEBO/MEBT. He has also inspired me to renew my commitment to practice, first and foremost, scientific medicine so as to always be open to learning innovative ways of offering the best care possible for my patients. He himself is an excel­lent example of this work ethic.

Burn regenerative therapy with moist-exposed burn ointment (MEBO) is the new standard of care for burn treatment. In the pages ahead, you will learn how Dr. Xu, in coopera­tion with natural laws inherent in living tissue, founded the new science of regenerative medicine for the benefit of burn patients in particular, and all mankind in general. Let us work together to silence forever the screams of pain during burn dressing changes which haunt too many of us in the field of burn treatment. Great suffering can serve to inspire heroic efforts. Today we can begin a his­toric collaboration together in the field of regenerative medicine and therapy, thanks to the pioneering effort of Prof. Rong Xiang Xu.

 

Bradford S. Weeks, M.D.    

Dated: 2004

The Weeks Clinic   www.weeksclinic.com

Recipient: International Orthomolecular Physician of the Year, 2003

FOR A COPY OF THIS REVOLUTIONARY BOOK,  SHOP HERE

Share This Post

Dr. Weeks’ Comment: These words written in 2004 remain as vital a caveat today as they were a decade ago.   Preface to   “Burns, Regenerative Medicine and Therapy” By Prof. Rong Xiang Xu, M.D. Co-Editor  Xia Sun, Ph.D. Co-Editor  Bradford S. Weeks, M.D.   PREFACE This book, which you now hold in your hands,…
&source=WeeksMD">