High Cholesterol protects against Infections

Dr. WEEKS COMMENT: Again, we find that things are neither good nor bad; they all have effects. The challenge is to assess the effects and see if you want what those effects. Cholesterol is a natural substance from which we make steroids and sex hormones – lots of good stuff. It has been stigmatized and people have bought a lot of expensive medications for perhaps dubious reasons. Revivew the article below and consider the pros and cons!

High Cholesterol protectec against Infections and atherosclerosis

U. Ravnskov Independent researcher


Many researchers have suggested that the blood lipids play a key role in the immune defence system.1–21 There is also a growing understanding that an inflammatory response of the arterial intima to injury is a crucial step in the genesis of atherosclerosis. and that infections may be one type of such injury.22 These two concepts are difficult to harmonize with the low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) receptor hypothesis, according to which high LDL cholesterol is the most important cause of atherosclerosis. However, the many observations that conflict with the LDL receptor hypothesis, may be explained by the idea that high serum cholesterol and/or high LDL is protective against infection and atherosclerosis.

Lipopolysaccharide, or endotoxin, the main pathogenic factor of Gram-negative bacteria, binds rapidly to lipoproteins,6 mainly LDL,7 and lipoprotein-bound endotoxin is unable to activate the secretion of various cytokines by monocytes in vitro.6,7,10 Also, Staphylococcus aureus {alpha}-toxin, a toxin produced by most pathogenic Staphylococcus strains and causing damage to a wide variety of cells, is bound and almost totally inactivated by human serum and purified LDL, as estimated by haemolytic titration.3

Mice with hypercholesterolaemia due to LDL-receptor deficiency, challenged with bacterial endotoxin, had an 8-fold increased LD50, and a significantly lower and delayed mortality after injection with Gram-negative bacteria, compared with control mice.15 Also, rats made hypolipidaemic with 4-aminopyrolo-(3,4-D)pyrimide or estradiol had a greater increase in cytokine levels and markedly increased endotoxin-induced mortality compared to normal rats, and administration of exogenous lipoprotein reduced their mortality substantially.12

In apparent contradiction, is a study of mice infected with Trypanosoma cruzi. These mice developed vasculitis and also atherosclerosis, but the latter was seen only if they were fed a Western-type high-fat diet in addition. However, total serum cholesterol (t-C) did not differ between infected mice fed a conventional diet and infected mice fed the high-fat diet, and t-C was lower in the latter group than in non-infected mice on the high-fat diet who did not develop atherosclerosis, indicating that the development of atherosclerosis was not due to high t-C but to something else associated with the diet.23

High t-C may have other beneficial effects on the immune system, because hypocholesterolaemic men had significantly fewer circulating lymphocytes, total T cells, helper T-cells and CD8+ cells than hypercholesterolaemic men.17 Also, adhesiveness to plastic surface, phagocytic activity and spontaneous motility of mononuclear cells from hypercholesterolaemic individuals were significantly higher compared to controls.8

In acute infections, cholesterol synthesis, measured as degree of 3H-mevalonic acid incorporation into free cholesterol, increases, but the disappearance rate of cholesterol from plasma is also increased,2 probably explaining why t-C may either go up or down in an unpredictable way during the course of various infectious diseases.1

Many epidemiological and clinical observations are in accord with the laboratory studies. A meta-analysis of 19 cohort studies including 68 406 deaths, found an inverse correlation between t-C and mortality from respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, most of which are of an infectious origin. It is unlikely that the low cholesterol was due to these diseases because the associations remained after the exclusion of deaths occurring during the first 5 years.24 Also, in a 15 year follow-up study of more than 120 000 individuals, Iribarren et al. found a strong inverse association between t-C (as determined initially) and the risk of being admitted to hospital due to an infectious disease.20 Statistically significant, inverse associations were found for urinary tract infections, all genitourinary infections and miscellaneous viral infections for women, and for urinary tract infections, musculo-skeletal infections and skin and subcutaneous infections in men. Inverse, but non-significant associations were found for most other infectious diseases. In a similar study of more than 100 000 individuals followed for 15 years, a strong, inverse association was found between t-C and the risk of being admitted to hospital because of pneumonia or influenza, but not for chronic, obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma.18

In a study of 2446 unmarried men with a previous history of sexually transmitted disease or liver disease followed for 14 years, a multivariate-adjusted analysis showed a risk ratio for HIV infection of 1.66 (95%CI 1.07–2.56) in the lowest cholesterol quartile compared with the risk in the second quartile.19 That the low t-C was secondary to HIV is unlikely, because those who became HIV positive during the first four years were excluded from the calculations. In accordance, an inverse association between t-C and the risk of death in AIDS was found in a follow-up of the MRFIT screenees.16

In patients with oedematous chronic heart failure, low t-C predicts impaired perioperative and long-term survival. As such patients show substantial immune activation and have raised plasma concentrations of bacterial lipopolysaccharide, Rachhaus et al. have suggested that high t-C has a protective effect in such patients.21 This may also explain why low t-C predicts mortality in patients with postoperative abdominal infections.14

Patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia run a high risk of dying from bacterial infectious disease. In 17 patients who developed neutropenia and fever after chemotherapy, t-C went down by almost 30%. During the infection, t-C was significantly higher in eleven survivors than in six non-survivors and returned to normal. Serum levels of inflammatory cytokines on day 8 after onset were significantly lower, and t-C before onset was also higher among the survivors, although not significantly so.25

In China, where mean t-C is much lower than in the Western world, chronic hepatitis B virus infection is ubiquitous and usually starts in early childhood. Adult chronic carriers of hepatitis B surface antigen, but not individuals with eradicated hepatitis B, have significantly lower t-C than non-carriers, suggesting a cause-effect relationship.26 However, the opposite interpretation, that low t-C prevents eradication, may be true as well. In support of this conjecture, the percentage of carriers in 81 districts was proportional to the mean t-C in these districts, suggesting that in populations with low t-C, more children infected with hepatitis B die, resulting in a lower number of chronic carriers.26 If hepatitis B was the cause of low t-C, the association should have been inverse.

Evidence for anti-infectious effects of high t-C is also available from inborn errors of cholesterol metabolism. Very low t-C is seen in Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, due to imperfect function of 7-dehydrocholesterol {Delta}7-reductase, necessary for the last step in cholesterol synthesis. Many children with this syndrome are stillborn or die early due to multiple malformations, and those who survive have frequent and severe infections. It could be argued that the cause was the high blood and tissue levels of 7-dehydrocholesterol, but low t-C may also play a role, because the infections became less serious and less frequent after supplementation with dietary cholesterol.27

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have very high LDL-C and t-C due to LDL-receptor deficiency. One of the main arguments for the LDL-receptor hypothesis is that members of such families run a great risk of dying from coronary heart disease at an early age. The size of that risk is not established with any certainty, however, as our clinical knowledge about this condition is mainly based on studies of patients selected because of existing heart disease or because of a family history of heart disease. To determine the risk of heart disease in individuals with FH demands follow-up studies, preferably of unselected individuals with FH, but such studies are rare. In one cohort study, only 6/214 individuals between age 20–39, and 8/237 between age 40–59, died from CHD during a four-year follow-up. Most striking was that during the same period, only 1/75 above age 60 died, equivalent to a standard mortality ratio of 0.44. As the participants in this study were selected because of a family history of heart disease, the authors concluded that the mortality might be even lower in unselected individuals.28

This assumption seems to be true. In a Dutch population, three carriers of a mutation for FH were identified through screening. A meticulous genealogical search of their pedigrees backward in time identified 250 individuals with a Mendelian probability of 0.5 of carrying the gene. Before year 1900, their standardized mortality ratio was lower than normal, and rose to a peak of less than twice normal in the 1930s to 1960s. The authors concluded that environmental factors may participate in the causation of coronary heart disease in FH, and that hypercholesterolaemia may have conferred a survival advantage when infectious disease was prevalent.29

Immunoprotective effects of high cholesterol explain observations contradicting the LDL-receptor hypothesis

According to the prevailing paradigm, high LDL cholesterol is said to promote atherosclerosis growth, which explains why it is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. There is much contradictory evidence, however.30–33 It is true that high t-C is a risk factor for coronary heart disease, but mainly in young and middle-aged men. If high t-C or LDL-C were the most important cause of cardiovascular disease, it should be a risk factor in both sexes, in all populations, and in all age groups. But in many populations, including women,24 Canadian and Russian men,34,35 Maoris,36 patients with diabetes,37,38 and patients with the nephrotic syndrome;39 the association between t-C and mortality is absent24,34,36–39 or inverse;35 or increasing t-C is associated with low coronary and total mortality.40 Most strikingly, in most cohort studies of old people, high LDL-C or t-C does not predict coronary heart disease28,40–50 (Table 1) or all-cause mortality28,40,42,44,48,51–58 (Table 2); in several of these studies the association between t-C and mortality was inverse,48,53,58 or high t-C was associated with longevity.51,54 These associations have mostly been considered as a minor aberration from the LDL-receptor hypothesis, although by far the highest mortality and the greatest part of all cardiovascular disease are seen in old people.


The fact that statin treatment lowers both total and cardiovascular mortality in high-risk individuals is taken as evidence that cholesterol lowering is effective. However, statins are just as effective whether cholesterol is lowered by a small amount (as in the unsuccessful non-statin trials) or by more than 40%. In addition, statin treatment is effective whether the initial LDL-C is high or low.59,60 If high LDL-C were causal, the greatest effect should have been seen in patients with the highest LDL-C, and in patients whose LDL-C was lowered the most, but this is not the case. Lack of dose-response cannot be attributed to the knowledge that the statins have other effects on plaque stabilization, as this would not have masked the effect of cholesterol-lowering, considering the pronounced lowering that was achieved. On the other hand, if high cholesterol has a protective function, as suggested, its lowering would counterbalance the beneficial effects of the statins and thus work against a dose-response relationship, which would be more in accord with the results seen. For example, the reduction of coronary mortality with simvastatin was almost three times greater in the 4S trial61 than in the HPS trial,62 despite the fact that LDL-C and t-C decreased to a much lower level in the latter.

The lack of exposure-response in the observational and experimental angiographic studies31 may be similarly explained. Minor increases of the mean lumen diameter were typically seen in the trials where statin treatment was used to lower cholesterol, but much too early to be explained by a reduction of atherosclerosis, and in the 21 trials and observational studies where exposure-response was calculated, no association was found except in one, the only trial where cholesterol was lowered by exercise. In addition, an inverse association between change of t-C and atherosclerosis growth was found in two of the five observational angiographic studies.31 It is also relevant, that in the only cholesterol-lowering clinical trial that included a post-mortem, complicated atherosclerosis was most pronounced in the treatment group.63

The effects of high cholesterol on the immune system may explain the inverse association with total mortality, because a possible increase of mortality from cardiovascular diseases may be counterbalanced by a lower mortality from infectious diseases. But it is difficult to explain the lack of an association between cholesterol and coronary mortality in old people, the inverse association between change of cholesterol and atherosclerosis growth, and the lack of exposure-response in the trials, unless high cholesterol has a protective role against atherosclerosis that may override its alleged promoting effect.

Contradictions to the hypothesis
The fact that high cholesterol predicts coronary heart disease in young and middle-aged men would seem to argue against any protective role for high cholesterol. However, high cholesterol may reflect the presence of factors promoting coronary heart disease, which may outweigh the beneficial effects. As most men of that age are in the midst of their professional career, high cholesterol may reflect mental stress, a well-known cause of high cholesterol, and also a significant risk factor for CHD. Thus, high cholesterol may be a risk marker for adrenal hyperfunction, not the true cause.

It may also be argued that even if coronary mortality in FH is lower than considered generally, it is much higher among young individuals with FH than in the general population. For instance, the finding of 6/214 deaths in the youngest age group mentioned above28 is equivalent to a standard mortality ratio of about 100, i.e. 100 times higher than in the general population, because it is extremely rare to die from CHD before age 40. However, it has been pointed out by many researchers that the vascular changes in homozygous FH should be characterized as a lipid storage disease, having few similarities with true atherosclerosis. Early vascular lesions are atypical, and the usual complications of atherosclerosis such as intimal tears, ulceration, thrombosis, tortuosity and aortic aneurysms are rare.64 Besides, autopsy and angiographic studies have shown a trivial or, most often, no association between plasma cholesterol and degree of atherosclerosis, even in FH individuals.31 It is therefore questionable that early CHD in FH patients is caused by their high cholesterol alone.

Pathological findings similar to those seen in FH are produced in experimental models of hypercholesterolaemic animals, but again, the pathological changes are not identical with human atherosclerosis, and no experiment has hitherto succeeded in producing a heart attack in an animal by hypercholesterolemia alone.65 Besides, these experimental changes cannot be produced by pure cholesterol, but very easily by its oxidation products, and it appears that most studies of experimental atherosclerosis have had little control over the purity of the dietary cholesterol.66 This issue may be complex, however. The arteries of animals may react differently to dietary changes from those of humans, and LDL may have various affinities to various types of infections. Thus, LDL-receptor-deficient mice were more susceptible to acute dissiminated Candida albicans infection than were normal mice.67 Also, in animal models of dietary-induced atherosclerosis, the pathological changes in the arteries were amplified by infection with Chlamydia pneumonia68 and bovine herpesvirus-4.69 The many observations mentioned above suggest that the beneficial effects of high cholesterol on the immune system predominate in human beings, but there is an obvious need for more research on the role of lipids in infectious and atherosclerotic diseases.


According to the modified ‘response to injury’ hypothesis of atherogenesis,22 there are at least two pathways leading to the inflammatory and proliferative lesions of the arterial intima. The first involves monocyte and platelet interaction induced by hypercholesterolaemia. The second pathway involves direct stimulation of the endothelium by a number of factors, including smoking, the metabolic consequences of diabetes, hyperhomocysteinemia, iron overload, copper deficiency, oxidized cholesterol, and micro-organisms. There is much evidence to support roles for these factors, but the degree to which each of them participates remains uncertain. However, the lack of exposure-response in the trials between changes in LDL-cholesterol and clinical and angiographic outcome, the inverse association between change of cholesterol and angiographic changes seen in the observational studies, the significant increase in complicated atherosclerotic lesions in the treatment group after cholesterol lowering by diet, and most of all, the fact that high cholesterol predicts longevity rather than mortality in old people, suggests that the role, if any, of high cholesterol must be trivial. The most likely explanation for these findings is that rather than promoting atherosclerosis, high cholesterol may be protective, possibly through its beneficial influence on the immune system.

Acknowledgments I am indebted to Kilmer McCully and Malcolm Kendrick for valuable comments. A shorter version of this paper was presented at the Weston A. Price Foundation 4th Annual Conference in Washington, DC, May 3, 2003. I have no competing financial interests in this subject.

Footnotes Address correspondence to Dr U. Ravnskov, Magle Stora Kyrkogata 9, S-22350, Sweden. e-mail: ravnskov@tele2.se

1. Gallin JI, Kaye D, O’Leary WM. Serum lipids in infection. N Engl J Med 1969; 281:1081–6.[ISI][Medline]

2. Fiser RH, Denniston JC, Rindsig RB, Beisel WR. Effects of acute infection on cholesterolgenesis in the Rhesus monkey. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1971; 138:605–9.[Medline]

3. Bhakdi S, Tranum-Jensen J, Utermann G, Füssle R. Binding and partial inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus a-toxin by human plasma low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:5899–904.[Free Full Text]

4. van Lenten BJ, Fogelman AM, Haberland ME, Edwards PA. The role of lipoproteins and receptor-mediated endocytosis in the transport of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:2704–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Flegel WA, Wolpl A, Mannel DN, Northoff H. Infect Immun 1989; 57:2237–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Cavaillon JM, Fitting C, Haeffner-Cavaillon N, Kirsch SJ, Warren HS. Cytokine response by monocytes and macrophages to free and lipoprotein-bound lipopolysaccharide. Infect Immun 1990; 58:2375–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Weinstock C, Ullrich H, Hohe R, Berg A, Baumstark MW, Frey I, Northoff H, Flegel WA. Low density lipoproteins inhibit endotoxin activation of monocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1992; 12:341–7.

8. Losche W, Krause S, Pohl A, Pohl C, Liebrenz A, Schauer I, Ruhling K, Till U. Functional behavior of mononuclear blood cells from patients with hypercholesterolemia. Thromb Res 1992; 65:337–42.[ISI][Medline]

9. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C. Role of cytokines in inducing hyperlipidemia. Diabetes 1992; 41(suppl. 32):97–101.[ISI]

10. Flegel WA, Baumstark MW, Weinstock C, Berg A, Northoff H. Prevention of endotoxin-induced monokine release by human low- and high-density lipoproteins and by apolipoprotein A-I. Infect Immun 1993; 61:5140–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Hardardottir I, Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Effects of endotoxin on lipid metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans 1995; 23:1013–18.[ISI][Medline]

12. Feingold KR, Funk JL, Moser AH, Shigenaga JK, Rapp JH, Grunfeld C. Role for circulating lipoproteins in protection from endotoxin toxicity. Infect Immun 1995; 63:2041–6.[Abstract]

13. Grunfeld C, Feingold KR. Regulation of lipid metabolism by cytokines during host defense. Nutrition 1996; 12(Suppl.):S24–6.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

14. Pacelli F, Doglietto GB, Alfieri S, Piccioni E, Sgadari A, Gui D, Crucitti F. Prognosis in intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis on 604 patients. Arch Surg 1996; 131:641–5.[Abstract]

15. Netera MG, Demacker PNM, Kullberg BJ, Boerman OC, Verschueren I, Stalenhoef AFH, van der Meer JWM. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice are protected against lethal endotoxemia and severe Gram-negative infections. J Clin Invest 1996; 97:1366–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Neaton JD, Wentworth DN. Low serum cholesterol and risk of death from AIDS. AIDS 1997; 11:929–30.[ISI][Medline]

17. Muldoon MF, Marsland A, Flory JD, Rabin BS, Whiteside TL, Manuck SB. Immune system differences in men with hypo- or hypercholesterolemia. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1997; 84:145–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

18. Iribarren C, Jacobs DR Jr, Sidney S, Claxton AJ, Gross MD, Sadler M, Blackburn H. Serum total cholesterol and risk of hospitalization, and death from respiratory disease. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26:1191–202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Claxton AJ, Jacobs DR Jr, Iribarren C, Welles SL, Sidney S, Feingold KR. Association between serum total cholesterol and HIV infection in a high-risk cohort of young men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1998; 17:51–7.[Medline]

20. Iribarren C, Jacobs DR Jr, Sidney S, Claxton AJ, Feingold KR. Cohort study of serum total cholesterol and in-hospital incidence of infectious diseases. Epidemiol Infect 1998; 121:335–47.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

21. Rauchhaus M, Coats AJ, Anker SD. The endotoxin-lipoprotein hypothesis. Lancet 2000; 356:930–3.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

22. Ross, R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis—an update. N Engl J Med 1986; 314:488–500.[ISI][Medline]

23. Sunnemark D, Harris RA, Frostegard J, Orn A. Induction of early atherosclerosis in CBA/J mice by combination of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and a high cholesterol diet. Atherosclerosis 2000; 153:273–82.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

24. Jacobs D, Blackburn H, Higgins M, Reed D, Iso H, McMillan G, Neaton J, Nelson J, Potter J, Rifkind B. Report of the conference on low blood cholesterol: Mortality associations. Circulation 1992; 86:1046–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Fraunberger P, Hahn J, Holler E, Walli AK, Seidel D. Serum cholesterol levels in neutropenic patients with fever. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002; 40:304–7.[ISI][Medline]

26. Chen Z, Keech A, Collins R, Slavin B, Chen J, Campbell TC, Peto R. Prolonged infection with hepatitis B virus and association between low blood cholesterol concentration and liver cancer. Br Med J 1993; 306:890–4.[ISI][Medline]

27. Elias ER, Irons MB, Hurley AD, Tint GS, Salen G. Clinical effects of cholesterol supplementation in six patients with the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS). Am J Med Genet 1997; 68:305–10.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

28. Scientific steering committee on behalf of the Simon Broome Register group. Risk of fatal coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Br Med J 1991; 303:893–6.[ISI][Medline]

29. Sijbrands EJG, Westendorp RGJ, Defesche JD, de Meier PHEM, Smelt AHM, Kastelein JJP. Mortality over two centuries in large pedigree with familial hypercholesterolaemia: family tree mortality study. Br Med J 2001; 322:1019–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Ravnskov U. The questionable role of saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51:443–60.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

31. Ravnskov U. Is atherosclerosis caused by high cholesterol. Q J Med 2002; 95:397–403.

32. Ravnskov U. A hypothesis out-of-date: The diet-heart idea. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55:1057–63.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

33. Ravnskov U. The Cholesterol Myths. Washington DC, New Trends Publishing, 2000.

34. Dagenais GR, Ahmed Z, Robitaille NM, Gingras S, Lupien PJ, Christen A, Meyer F, Rochon J. Total and coronary heart disease mortality in relation to major risk factors—Quebec cardiovascular study. Can J Cardiol 1990; 6:59–65.[ISI][Medline]

35. Shestov DB, Deev AD, Klimov AN, Davis CE, Tyroler HA. Increased risk of coronary heart disease death in men with low total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the Russian Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Follow-up Study. Circulation 1993; 88:846–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Beaglehole R, Foulkes MA, Prior IA, Eyles EF. Cholesterol and mortality in New Zealand Maoris. Br Med J 1980; 280:285–7.[ISI][Medline]

37. Jarrett RJ. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1992; 41(Suppl. 2):1–3.[Abstract]

38. Orchard TJ. The impact of gender and general risk factors on the occurrence of atherosclerotic vascular disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Med 1996; 28:323–33.[ISI][Medline]

39. Ravnskov U. Hypercholesterolemia does not cause coronary heart disease—evidence from the nephrotic syndrome. Nephron 1994; 66:356–9.[ISI][Medline]

40. Anderson KM, Castelli WP, Levy D. Cholesterol and mortality. 30 years of follow-up from the Framingham study. JAMA 1987; 257:2176–80.[Abstract]

41. Forette F, de la Fuente X, Golmard JL, Henry JF, Hervy MP. The prognostic significance of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. Results of a ten year longitudinal survey. Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1982; 4:1177–91.[ISI][Medline]

42. Siegel D, Kuller L, Lazarus NB, Black D, Feigal D, Hughes G, Schoenberger JA, Hulley SB. Predictors of cardiovascular events and mortality in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program pilot project. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126:385–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Nissinen A, Pekkanen J, Porath A, Punsar S, Karvonen MJ. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease among 55 to 74 year-old Finnish men: a 10-year follow-up. Ann Med 1989; 21:239–40.[ISI][Medline]

44. Krumholz HM, Seeman TE, Merrill SS, Mendes de Leon CF, Vaccarino V, Silverman DI, Tsukahara R, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF. Lack of association between cholesterol and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity and all-cause mortality in persons older than 70 years. JAMA 1994; 272:1335–40.[Abstract]

45. Weijenberg MP, Feskens EJ, Bowles CH, Kromhout D. Serum total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure as risk factors for mortality from ischemic heart disease among elderly men and women. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47:197–205.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

46. Simons LA, McCallum J, Friedlander Y, Simons J. Diabetes, mortality and coronary heart disease in the prospective Dubbo study of Australian elderly. Aust NZ J Med 1996; 26:66–74.[ISI][Medline]

47. Weijenberg MP, Feskens EJ, Kromhout D. Total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol as risk factors for coronary heart disease in elderly men during 5 years of follow-up. The Zutphen Elderly Study. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143:151–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Räihä I, Marniemi J, Puukka P, Toikka T, Ehnholm C, Sourander L. Effect of serum lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins on vascular and nonvascular mortality in the elderly. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17:1224–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Simons LA, Simons J, Friedlander Y, McCallum J. Cholesterol and other lipids predict coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke in the elderly, but only in those below 70 years. Atherosclerosis 2001; 159:201–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

50. Abbott RD, Curb JD, Rodriguez BL, Masaki KH, Yano K, Schatz IJ, Ross GW, Petrovitch H. Age-related changes in risk factor effects on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Ann Epidemiol 2002; 12:173–81.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

51. Forette B, Tortrat D, Wolmark Y. Cholesterol as risk factor for mortality in elderly women. Lancet 1989; 1:868–70.[ISI][Medline]

52. Zimetbaum P, Frishman WH, Ooi WL, Derman MP, Aronson M, Gidez LI, Eder HA. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the very elderly. The Bronx aging study. Arterioscl Thromb 1992; 12:416–23.[Abstract]

53. Weverling-Rijnsburger AW, Blauw GJ, Lagaay AM, Knook DL, Meinders AE, Westendorp RG. Total cholesterol and risk of mortality in the oldest old. Lancet 1997; 350:1119–23.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

54. Jonsson A, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. Total cholesterol and mortality after age 80 years. Lancet 1997; 350:1778–9.[Medline]

55. Fried LP, Kronmal RA, Newman AB, Bild DE, Mittelmark MB, Polak JF, Robbins JA, Gardin JM. Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA 1998; 279:585–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Chyou PH, Eaker ED. Serum cholesterol concentrations and all-cause mortality in older people. Age Ageing 2000; 29:69–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Menotti A, Mulder I, Nissinen A, Feskens E, Giampaoli S, Tervahauta M, Kromhout D. Cardiovascular risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality in elderly European male populations; the FINE study. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:573–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Schatz IJ, Masaki K, Yano K, Chen R, Rodriguez BL, Curb JD. Cholesterol and all-cause mortality in elderly people from the Honolulu Heart Program: a cohort study. Lancet 2001; 358:351–5.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

59. Sacks FM, Moye LA, Davis BR, Cole TG, Rouleau JL, Nash DT, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Relationship between plasma LDL concentrations during treatment with pravastatin and recurrent coronary events in the cholesterol and recurrent events trial. Circulation 1998; 97:1446–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, Zeiher A, Chaitman BR, Leslie S, Stern T; Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study Investigators. Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 285:1711–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994; 344:1383–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

62. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360:7–22.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

63. Dayton S, Pearce ML, Hashimoto S, Dixon WJ, Tomayasu U. A controlled clinical trial of a diet high in unsaturated fat in preventing complications of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1969; 40:1–63.[Free Full Text]

64. Stehbens WE, Martin M. The vascular pathology of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Pathology 1991; 23:54–61.[ISI][Medline]

65. Stehbens WE. An appraisal of cholesterol feeding in experimental atherogenesis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1986; 29:107–28.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

66. Peng SK, Taylor CB. Cholesterol autoxidation, health and arteriosclerosis. A review on situations in developed countries. World Rev Nutr Diet 1984; 44:117–54.[Medline]

67. Netea MG, Demacker PN, de Bont N, Boerman OC, Stalenhoef AF, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ. Hyperlipoproteinemia enhances susceptibility to acute disseminated Candida albicans infection in low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-deficient mice. Infect Immun 1997; 65:2663–7.[Abstract]

68. Hu H, Pierce GN, Zhong G. The atherogenic effects of chlamydia are dependent on serum cholesterol and specific to Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Clin Invest 1999; 103:747–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

69. Lin TM, Jiang MJ, Eng HL, Shi GY, Lai LC, Huang BJ, Huang KY, Wu HL. Experimental infection with bovine herpesvirus-4 enhances atherosclerotic process in rabbits. Lab Invest 2000; 80:3–11.[ISI][Medline]

Post Comment