The success rate of chemotherapy = 2.1% … huh??

Tragically, the five year survival rate for cancer treated with chemotherapy drugs  has remained virtually unchanged for decades. More tragically, that fact is not told to patients by oncologists offering “the standard of care”.  (Note: there is an alleged survey (whose reference I can not currently locate so I can not verify!) regarding  oncologists in Southern California which concluded that 90% of oncologists would NOT take the protocols they prescribe patients were they themselves to get cancer.”)

FACT:  approximately 2% of all cancers respond to chemotherapy.

FACT: Chemotherapy as commonlyprescribed hurts more than it help.

OPINION:  “The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA . . . chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required.”

Sez  who?

Says:  Morgan G, Ward R, Barton M. in his article:  The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies.

Published where?  Some fringe journal?

No.  It was published in the premiere cancer journal: Clinical Oncology                        (see  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004 Dec;16(8):549-60.)

Well,  is this new information? When was it published?

Only  4  YEARS  ago! !!    December  2004

Well, if this has been known for the past 4 years, why doesn’t my oncologist (who is this very minute pressuring me to take chemotherapy)  know about the overall worthlessness of chemotherapy as it is conventionally prescribed?

Ask him or her!

So, what good IS chemotherapy?

In the context of Corrective Health,  if used in 1/10 the standard dose in a targeted manner with insulin as a potentiating factor,  chemotherapy is considered by patients to be “hard on cancer and easy on patients”.  They also call this technique (first developed in 1940) as  “side-effect free chemotherapy”.

SUMMARY:   Like any tool, chemotherapy drugs can be used or misused – they can be used elegantly or, quite sadly as is commonly known today,  they can be wielded like a blunt instrument. See IPT  Treatment at a Glance and The Biochemistry of IPT to learn more about the elegant use of chemotherapy.

Print Friendly
Filed in: Cancer, Chemotherapy

Recent Posts

© 2015 WeeksMD. All rights reserved.


The information contained on these web pages is derived from Dr. Weeks’ years of clinical experience and his review of scientific literature. However, these ideas and information are for your education and entertainment only. They are positively not intended to be a substitute for careful medical evaluation and treatment by a competent, licensed personal health care professional. Dr. Weeks and his associates do not recommend changing any current medications or adding any new therapies without personally consulting a fully qualified physician. Dr. Weeks and his staff specifically disclaim any liability arising directly or indirectly from information contained on these Web pages.

Varying and even conflicting views are held by other segments of the medical profession. The information presented on these Web pages is intended to be educational and entertaining in nature and is not intended as a basis for diagnosis or treatment. This information is current at the time of posting on the World Wide Web, and is published and distributed as a courtesy to the public.