Dr. Weeks’ Comment: Corrective Cancer Care™ urges “centisble” treatments (those which are safer, more effective and more cost effective” and, increasingly, conventional (corporate) oncologists are seeing the light and opting for anti-inflammatory (Celebrex™) and onco-immunologcial (NK and CAR-T cells) agents instead of the standard of care – chemotherapy and radiation therapy. This is great news since the standard of care makes the lethal cancer STEM cells “more numerous and more virulent.”
“NK cells may just be safer to use.” Prof. Dan S. Kaufman
Cancer immunotherapy ‘could be safer’ with natural killer cells
Researchers use immune cells cultured from stem cells (shown here) to kill cancer cells.
The approach may lead to “off-the-shelf” stocks of cancer-killing cells, say researchers from the University of California, San Diego and the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.
In a paper now published in the journal Cell Stem Cell, the authors describe how the cells showed enhanced “anti-tumor activity” in mice with ovarian cancer seeded from human cancer cells.
The immunotherapy is a type known as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy. It increases immune cells’ cancer-killing power by reprogramming them to express CAR protein, which has been engineered to bind only to cancer cells.
Advantages of natural killer cells
Typically, CAR immunotherapy uses genetically altered white blood cells known as T cells that are grown from cells taken from patients. This approach is called CAR-T cell immunotherapy and has been the focus of much research and funding lately.
But the new approach uses natural killer (NK) cells obtained from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) instead of patient-specific T cells.
“NK cells,” explains senior study author Dan S. Kaufman, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Diego, “offer significant advantages as they don’t have to be matched to a specific patient.”
Because, he adds, “one batch of iPSC-derived NK cells can be potentially used to treat thousands of patients,” it opens the prospect of “standardized, ‘off-the-shelf’ treatments” for use with other anticancer drugs.
CAR-T cell obstacles
CAR-T cell immunotherapy has shown great promise but positive results from trials have not always translated to clinical success.
Prof. Kaufman and team describe several obstacles. First is the fact that CAR-T cell therapy needs T cells taken from the patient and only works for that patient.
This is time-consuming as it involves extracting the cells, engineering them, and then expanding their number in the laboratory before infusing them back into the patient.
In addition, not all patients that might benefit from CAR-T cell therapy are in a position to give the cells. Also, their cancer could be progressing so fast that by the time the engineered cells are ready, the window of opportunity has closed.
There have also been increasing concerns about the safety of CAR-T therapy. In fact, Prof. Kaufman notes that there have been some cases of “severe toxicity or adverse effects” that have led to organ failure and death.
He and his colleagues have already conducted some research into NK cells that suggested that they do not produce the same adverse side effects. They also found that they produced “few adverse effects” in the mouse models they used in the new study.
The researchers tested NK cells obtained from human iPSCs engineered to express CAR in mouse models of ovarian cancer.
These mouse models were developed by transplanting human ovarian cancer cells into mice with suppressed immune systems so they did not reject the human cells. The cancer cells then grew into tumors.
The team found that the CAR NK cells showed a similar level of anti-tumor activity as CAR-T cells but with “less toxicity.” And, they were more effective than NK cells that did not express CAR.
Prof. Kaufman suggests that tests on blood cancer and other solid cancers — such as of the brain, colon, and breast — would likely show similar promising results.
“NK cells may just be safer to use.”
Prof. Dan S. Kaufman