Leukemic-Regenerating Cells vs Cancer STEM Cells

Dr. Weeks’ Comment:  In 1987,  I wrote a poem about the religious aspect of scientific investigation called the Ode to The Totipotent Haematopoetic Stem Cell – just when stem cell investigation was beginning.   Since then, Corrective Cancer Care™  has focused on cancer STEM cells and not the relatively harmless cancer TUMOR cells because only the cancer STEM cell can metastasize. Here a new cell is described which has stem-cell like properties but the researchers claims is not a leukemia STEM cell.  What is clear is the conventional chemo and radiation is NOT the answer as it make cancer stem cells  “more numerous and more virulent“.



  • Leukemic-regenerating cells (LRCs) arise post-chemotherapy and are distinct from LSCs
  • LRC emergence exclusively arises from indirect in vivo effects of AraC treatment
  • LRCs can be targeted to suppress accelerated re-growth that contributes to relapse
  • Features of LRCs emerge in AML patients undergoing chemotherapy and predict relapse


Despite successful remission induction, recurrence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a clinical obstacle thought to be caused by the retention of dormant leukemic stem cells (LSCs). Using chemotherapy-treated AML xenografts and patient samples, we have modeled patient remission and relapse kinetics to reveal that LSCs are effectively depleted via cell-cycle recruitment, leaving the origins of relapse unclear. Post-chemotherapy, in vivo characterization at the onset of disease relapse revealed a unique molecular state of leukemic-regenerating cells (LRCs) responsible for disease re-growth. LRCs are transient, can only be detected in vivo, and are molecularly distinct from therapy-naive LSCs. We demonstrate that LRC features can be used as markers of relapse and are therapeutically targetable to prevent disease recurrence.


Study identifies an unexpected cell population key to blood cancer relapse

September 10, 2018, McMaster University

McMaster University researchers have provided evidence of new cancerous cells they have termed cancer regenerating cells, which are responsible for the return of acute myeloid leukemia after remission.

Current therapy is effective at inducing remission in adult patients with , but most patients later succumb after a . That relapse has been thought to be caused by rare and dormant  stem cells that escape .

The study published today in the journal Cancer Cell suggests that leukemia cells change in unique ways in response to the chemotherapy, allowing them to masquerade for a short time so they are able to start disease regeneration.

The research involved combined efforts from both scientists and physicians and spanned more than five years in development. The team took on the challenge of hunting down the rare leukemic cells that remain right after chemotherapy treatment. The surprise was that the most resilient cells left behind after the treatment did not fit the profile of cancer stem cells.

“Many cancer researchers, including our team, have thought it was dormant  that can resist chemotherapy treatment which go on to cause relapse,” said Mick Bhatia, lead author and director of the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute.

Bhatia noted that, until now, the initial aftermath immediately after chemotherapy treatment has been largely unexplored, because leftover leukemia cells easily blend into the body and go undetected amid the chaos caused by the therapy itself.

“Chemotherapy is not entirely specific and destroys a lot of other tissues, making the patient’s body a difficult place to do the detective work to find cells responsible for relapse,” he said.

“It’s like trying to find a pen of unknown color or type in an office where a bomb went off. What we were trying to find is what causes the relapse somewhere where a bomb—in this case chemotherapy—had already caused so much collateral damage.”

To overcome these hurdles, the team turned to a model where patient leukemic disease is established in laboratory mice, and chemotherapy can be administered to match the way patients are treated in the clinic.

“This design allowed us to zero in on the few human leukemic cells that survived, because we could easily distinguish them from non-diseased mouse cells”, said Lili Aslostovar, co-author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow of the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute. “We were finally able to detail what takes place during this transient period before the storm of relapse occurs.”

The team’s key finding was to identify the point at which the disease retaliates by becoming highly regenerative, setting the stage for eventual relapse. This offered a new roadmap to identify the camouflaged cancer cells that hide out in the bone marrow of leukemia patients shortly after chemotherapy treatment. Importantly, similar patterns of leukemic regeneration could be seen across a spectrum of different patient subtypes, providing a common thread to guide the development of new therapies at the critical time point after chemotherapy.

“This is a major clinical opportunity because this type of leukemia is very diverse and responds differently across patients,” said Allison Boyd, co-author of the study and a postdoctoral fellow at the institute.

“It has been a challenge in a clinical setting to find a commonality for therapeutic targeting across the wide array of patients, and these regenerative cells provide that similarity,” she said.

The researchers hope that this new understanding of leukemic regeneration will provide physicians the opportunity to introduce additional drugs in combination with . This will take advantage of chemotherapy’s benefits while counteracting its shortcomings at the same time by targeting these altered cancer cells, said Bhatia.

“We were impressed that after chemotherapy, the disease seems to get very weak because the cancerous stem  have been largely eliminated,” said Boyd. “We think there are opportunities here because now we have a window where we can kick the cancer while it’s down.”

Bhatia said the study results support further pursuing this new emerging hypothesis into causes of cancer relapse which is in part related to chemotherapy response, and would likely apply to additional cancers other than leukemia.

“Chemotherapy has increased the number of years cancer patients survive, but if you look at the overall death rates for people with , they are relatively unchanged,” said Bhatia. “The problem is that the tumour comes back. It’s the relapse, then, that kills the . Our goal is to prevent the relapse altogether.”

More information: Cancer Cell (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.007 , http://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/fulltext/S1535-6108(18)30367-2

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *